fix: preserve multi-type type union when schema has subschemas (#954)

typify-impl/src/convert.rs

@@ -464,11 +464,15 @@ impl TypeSpace {
                 extensions: _,
             } => self.convert_unknown_enum(type_name, original_schema, metadata, enum_values),
 
-            // Subschemas
+            // Subschemas with no body validation and either no type or a
+            // single type. A multi-type (`Vec`) instance_type is deliberately
+            // excluded so that it flows through the merge arm below, which
+            // folds the type union into each subschema branch. Preserving the
+            // earlier behaviour for `None` / `Single` keeps existing tolerant
+            // handling of schemas whose outer type may conflict with a branch.
             SchemaObject {
                 metadata,
-                // TODO we probably shouldn't ignore this...
-                instance_type: _,
+                instance_type: None | Some(SingleOrVec::Single(_)),
                 format: None,
                 enum_values: None,
                 const_value: None,

typify/tests/schemas/type-array-with-subschemas.json

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "$comment": "Regression coverage for issue #954: schemas with a multi-type `type: [...]` array on the same object as `oneOf` / `anyOf` / `allOf` / `not` previously discarded the `type` constraint (TODO at convert.rs wildcarded `instance_type`). Single-type + subschema cases must still pass through the earlier arm unchanged.",
+  "definitions": {
+    "TypeArrayOneOfItems": {
+      "$comment": "Canonical issue #954 shape. Each oneOf branch only constrains `items`, so the type union must be folded into every branch rather than dropped.",
+      "type": [ "string", "number", "boolean", "array" ],
+      "oneOf": [
+        { "items": { "type": "string" } },
+        { "items": { "type": "number" } },
+        { "items": { "type": "boolean" } }
+      ]
+    },
+    "TypeArrayAnyOfItems": {
+      "$comment": "Same shape as TypeArrayOneOfItems but using anyOf. anyOf travels through try_merge_with_each_subschema on a sibling path from oneOf; it should fold the type union the same way.",
+      "type": [ "string", "number", "array" ],
+      "anyOf": [
+        { "items": { "type": "string" } },
+        { "items": { "type": "number" } }
+      ]
+    },
+    "TypeArrayAllOfRefinement": {
+      "$comment": "allOf is folded pairwise into the parent rather than producing branches. The type union must survive and the array-only constraints should apply when the Array variant is selected.",
+      "type": [ "string", "array" ],
+      "allOf": [
+        { "items": { "type": "string" } },
+        { "minItems": 1 }
+      ]
+    },
+    "TypeArrayNotExclusion": {
+      "$comment": "not: object is redundant when the outer type union excludes object, but merging must not drop the type union when the not branch is applied.",
+      "type": [ "string", "number", "array" ],
+      "not": { "type": "object" }
+    },
+    "SingleTypeOneOfArrayBranch": {
+      "$comment": "Regression guard (rust-collisions pattern). Outer singleton type + oneOf where one branch has a conflicting explicit type. This must continue to pass through the earlier arm (no merge), otherwise the array branch becomes unsatisfiable and is silently dropped.",
+      "type": "object",
+      "oneOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "object",
+          "properties": { "kind": { "type": "string" } },
+          "required": [ "kind" ]
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "array",
+          "items": { "type": "string" },
+          "minItems": 2,
+          "maxItems": 2
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "TypeArrayOneOfExplicitArrayBranches": {
+      "$comment": "Case 7: each oneOf branch pins `type: array`, so the intersection with the outer type union must prune the non-array primitives. Only array variants should be emitted.",
+      "type": [ "string", "array" ],
+      "oneOf": [
+        { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
+        { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "number" } }
+      ]
+    },
+    "TypeArrayPartiallyUnsatisfiableOneOf": {
+      "$comment": "Some oneOf branches conflict with the outer type union and should be dropped during merge; the surviving branch must carry the outer type union. The two eliminated branches use object/number which the outer `[string, array]` disallows.",
+      "type": [ "string", "array" ],
+      "oneOf": [
+        { "type": "object", "properties": { "name": { "type": "string" } } },
+        { "items": { "type": "string" } },
+        { "type": "number" }
+      ]
+    },
+    "TypeArrayFullyUnsatisfiableOneOf": {
+      "$comment": "Case 9: every branch conflicts with the outer type union, so `try_merge_with_each_subschema` returns empty and the schema resolves to never. Must emit an empty enum cleanly rather than panic.",
+      "type": [ "string", "number" ],
+      "oneOf": [
+        { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
+        { "type": "object", "properties": { "k": { "type": "string" } } }
+      ]
+    },
+    "TypeArrayOneOfAndAllOf": {
+      "$comment": "Case 10: oneOf and allOf on the same object, both alongside a multi-type `type` array. Exercises the full merge path (allOf folded first, then oneOf fanned out) with the Vec instance_type flowing through the merge arm.",
+      "type": [ "string", "array" ],
+      "allOf": [
+        { "minLength": 1 }
+      ],
+      "oneOf": [
+        { "items": { "type": "string" } },
+        { "items": { "type": "number" } }
+      ]
+    }
+  }
+}