Conversation
chenson2018
requested changes
Apr 29, 2026
Collaborator
chenson2018
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Starting with just a couple of comments about the additions in Cslib.Foundations.Data.Relation
Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
||
| open scoped Proposition | ||
|
|
||
| theorem k_leq_d : (K World Atom ≤ D World Atom) := by |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
similarly as above, ≤ unfolds to ⊆
chenson2018
reviewed
Apr 29, 2026
kmill
reviewed
Apr 29, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds Modal Logic and the Modal Cube, including all the 15 well-known modal logics (K, D, T, S5, etc.) and their relationships.
The notation that overlaps with propositional logic is consistent with the existing module.
Note for future work (or here, if somebody can see an easy fix that doesn't compromise readability for modal logicians): I'm not very satisfied by the notation for judgements, which includes a ',' so it can lead to some parsing trouble.