fix(grpc): add isolation_scope to async server interceptor

[robinvd]

Description

Fixes #5894

The async gRPC server interceptor was missing isolation_scope() wrapping, causing scope state to leak between concurrent requests. The sync interceptor already had this. This PR adds the missing isolation scope to the async unary_unary handler and adds a test proving request isolation.

Issues

• resolves: gRPC aio ServerInterceptor missing isolation_scope per request #5894

Reminders

• Please add tests to validate your changes, and lint your code using tox -e linters.
• Add GH Issue ID & Linear ID (if applicable)
• PR title should use conventional commit style (feat:, fix:, ref:, meta:)
• For external contributors: CONTRIBUTING.md, Sentry SDK development docs, Discord community

[github-actions]

Semver Impact of This PR

🟢 Patch (bug fixes)

📋 Changelog Preview

This is how your changes will appear in the changelog.
Entries from this PR are highlighted with a left border (blockquote style).

---

New Features ✨

• (ci) Cancel in-progress PR workflows on new commit push by joshuarli in #5994

Bug Fixes 🐛

• (grpc) Add isolation_scope to async server interceptor by robinvd in #5940

Internal Changes 🔧

• Set explicit base-branch for codecov action by ericapisani in #5992

---

_{🤖 This preview updates automatically when you update the PR.}

[ericapisani]

Thanks for opening this PR @robinvd !

This PR adds the missing isolation scope to the async unary_unary handler and adds a test proving request isolation.

I'm not seeing the test mentioned in your description in this change set - was it potentially missed in the commit that was made?

[robinvd]

not seeing the test mentioned in your description in this change set - was it potentially missed in the commit that was made?

thanks so much for checking this out @ericapisani ! i wrote the description but then never got around to the test. I can still make one if thats required!

[alexander-alderman-webb]

I think this clearly didn't isolate requests before and does now. I'll go ahead and merge now @robinvd, thanks for the contribution!