remove detail design sphinx elements

[RolandJentschETAS]

Remove detail design sphinx elements according to the current process description.

See https://eclipse-score.github.io/process_description/main/process_areas/implementation/implementation_concept.html

📌 Description

🚨 Impact Analysis

• This change does not violate any tool requirements and is covered by existing tool requirements
• This change does not violate any design decisions
• Otherwise I have created a ticket for new tool qualification

✅ Checklist

• Added/updated documentation for new or changed features
• Added/updated tests to cover the changes
• Followed project coding standards and guidelines

[github-actions]

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //src:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output

[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.6.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: a7a99604-c0b9-4756-8de2-89c7f705d265
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
WARNING: Target pattern parsing failed.
ERROR: Skipping '//src:license-check': no such target '//src:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package 'src' defined by /home/runner/work/docs-as-code/docs-as-code/src/BUILD
ERROR: no such target '//src:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package 'src' defined by /home/runner/work/docs-as-code/docs-as-code/src/BUILD
INFO: Elapsed time: 5.446s
INFO: 0 processes.
ERROR: Build did NOT complete successfully
ERROR: Build failed. Not running target

[github-actions]

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

[AlexanderLanin]

Almost a perfect PR 😆

[AlexanderLanin]

LGTM

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

@RolandJentschETAS this PR has merge conflicts, can you resolve them?

Otherwise looks good to me 💯

[RolandJentschETAS]

@RolandJentschETAS this PR has merge conflicts, can you resolve them?

Otherwise looks good to me 💯

Merge conflicts resolved