Skip to content

[2026-03 LWG Motion 29] P3980R1 Task’s Allocator Use#8918

Merged
tkoeppe merged 1 commit intocplusplus:mainfrom
eisenwave:motions-2026-03-lwg-29
Apr 20, 2026
Merged

[2026-03 LWG Motion 29] P3980R1 Task’s Allocator Use#8918
tkoeppe merged 1 commit intocplusplus:mainfrom
eisenwave:motions-2026-03-lwg-29

Conversation

@eisenwave
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@eisenwave eisenwave commented Apr 4, 2026

@eisenwave eisenwave added this to the post-2026-03 milestone Apr 4, 2026
@eisenwave
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Touches on the weird area of #8917

@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2026-03-lwg-29 branch 7 times, most recently from 662d842 to a6814fd Compare April 20, 2026 00:45
Fixes NB US 254-385, US 253-386, US 255-384, and US 261-391 (C++26 CD).

Editorial note: the wording has been reconciled with intervening
changes from LWG 4339 and LWG 4347 from LWG Motion 2.
@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2026-03-lwg-29 branch from a6814fd to 56ce025 Compare April 20, 2026 00:51
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 2bfa83f into cplusplus:main Apr 20, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[task.promise] operator new definition does not match synopsis [2026-03 LWG Motion 29] P3980R1 Task’s Allocator Use P3980 R0 Task's Allocator Use

2 participants